GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M270DX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Topaz |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |