GRID K280Q vs Radeon R9 M375X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon R9 M375X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Radeon R9 M375X, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
Radeon R9 M375X
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 180 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tropo |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |