FirePro M5950 vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5950 and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5950 stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 542% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 20 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 185% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 75% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |