FirePro M7740 vs GRID K520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M7740 and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M7740 and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 95 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M7740 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 96% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Kepler |
| Code name | RV740 | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |