FirePro V4900 vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K520
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 104 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
FirePro V4900 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
ultra / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 170% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
6−7
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
10−11
35−40
high / 1080p
5−6
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K520
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
23 July 2013
Pipelines
480
1536
Core clock speed
800 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
95.36
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2x 2,448 gflops
Length
163 mm
267 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
76 Mh/s
Check Price
