FirePro V5900 vs GRID K520

When comparing FirePro V5900 and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5900 and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

GRID K520

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	GRID K520
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 145 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 37 mm longer, than FirePro V5900.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	24−27	55−60
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−35
high / 768p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	95−100
ultra / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 125% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	10−11
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	9−10	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	60−65
medium / 768p	12−14	35−40
high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	GRID K520
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	23 July 2013
Pipelines	512	1536
Core clock speed	600 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	95.36
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	230 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	76 Mh/s
	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs GRID K520

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares