FirePro V7900 vs GRID K520

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V7900 and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V7900 and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

GRID K520

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID K520
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K520 has 49% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 20 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 12 mm longer, than GRID K520.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 and GRID K520 is 5000 MHz.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V7900 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	180−190
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	110−120	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 35% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	80−85
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	60−65
medium / 768p	24−27	35−40
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID K520
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	23 July 2013
Pipelines	1280	1536
Core clock speed	725 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	76 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs GRID K520

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares