FirePro W4190M vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W4190M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
Code name | Mars XTX? | GK104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |