FireStream 9370 vs GRID K520

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9370

GRID K520

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K520
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9370 and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	210−220
medium / 768p	160−170	180−190
ultra / 1080p	85−90	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	120−130	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	85−90	95−100
ultra / 1080p	55−60	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	85−90	100−110
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 21% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	65−70	80−85
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−11
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	60−65
medium / 768p	27−30	35−40
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K520
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Cypress	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	23 July 2013
Pipelines	1600	1536
Core clock speed	825 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		76 Mh/s

FireStream 9370 vs GRID K520

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares