GeForce 825M vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce 825M and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1500% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 340% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |