GeForce 920M vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920M and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920M stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N16V-GM-S | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |