GeForce GT 750M vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 222 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 750M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 117% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |