GeForce GT 755M vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 235 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 400 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 755M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 76% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N14P- | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |