GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K520.
GeForce GTX 295
GRID K520
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 497 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID K520 is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |