GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce GTX 850M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 850M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 850M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- GeForce GTX 850M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 850M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | N15P-GT | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |