GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N15P-GX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |