GeForce MX230 vs GRID K520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX230 and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX230 and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX230 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX230 and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 774 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX230 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX230 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G0 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |