GRID K240Q vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GRID K520
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q and GRID K520 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 43% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |