GRID K520 vs GRID M60 8Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.

GRID K520

GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

	GRID K520	GRID M60 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 188 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
GRID K520 and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	100−110	110−120
QHD / 1440p	55−60	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−35	45−50
high / 768p	140−150	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	120−130
medium / 1080p	55−60	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	10−11	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	80−85	90−95
high / 1080p	30−35	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
GRID K520 and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
high / 1080p	20−22	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M60 8Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	GRID M60 8Q
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1536	2048
Core clock speed	745 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	150.8
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares