GRID K520 vs HD Graphics 630

When comparing GRID K520 and HD Graphics 630, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and HD Graphics 630 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K520

HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

	GRID K520	HD Graphics 630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	20−22	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K520 and HD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	45−50
QHD / 1440p	55−60	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
high / 768p	140−150	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	95−100	55−60
ultra / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	18−20	3−4
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	27−30	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	55−60	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	27−30	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	20−22
medium / 1080p	30−35	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	60−65	16−18
medium / 768p	35−40	12−14
high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than HD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	HD Graphics 630
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	1 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	24
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.40
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	441.6 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+

GRID K520 vs HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares