GRID K520 vs Iris Graphics 540
When comparing GRID K520 and Iris Graphics 540, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Graphics 540 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |