GRID K520 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 165% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 10 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |