GRID K520 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |