GRID K520 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between GRID K520 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 75.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |