GRID K520 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing GRID K520 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 345 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |