GRID K520 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Mobility Radeon HD 4870, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Mobility Radeon HD 4870, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4870 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 195 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4112 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 1 |
Code name | GK104 | M98-XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 888 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 56.83 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |