GRID K520 vs Quadro 2000D

When comparing GRID K520 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K520

Quadro 2000D

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro 2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI

GRID K520 has 262% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 89 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	20−22	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	35−40
QHD / 1440p	55−60	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−35	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	95−100	45−50
ultra / 1080p	65−70	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	10−12
medium / 1080p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	27−30	5−6
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	2−3
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	30−35	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	10−11	1−2
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	4−5
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	30−35	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	60−65	9−10
medium / 768p	35−40	8−9
high / 1080p	20−22	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro 2000D
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	5 October 2011
Pipelines	1536	192
Core clock speed	745 MHz	625 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	20.00
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length	267 mm	178 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	31 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs Quadro 2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares