GRID K520 vs Quadro 4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro 4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Quadro 4000M, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 270 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 82 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |