GRID K520 vs Quadro K2000D
In this comparison between GRID K520 and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
Main Specs
GRID K520
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K520 has 341% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 and Quadro K2000D are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 65 mm longer, than Quadro K2000D.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
20−22
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K520 and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
140−150
medium / 768p
180−190
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
55−60
QHD / 1440p
55−60
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−35
27−30
high / 768p
140−150
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
95−100
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
18−20
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
65−70
medium / 1080p
55−60
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 76% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
90−95
55−60
medium / 768p
80−85
50−55
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
10−11
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
60−65
27−30
medium / 768p
35−40
18−20
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
GRID K520
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
GK107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
23 July 2013
1 March 2013
Pipelines
1536
384
Core clock speed
745 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
30.53
Floating-point performance
2x 2,448 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
267 mm
202 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
64 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
76 Mh/s
31 Mh/s
Check Price
