GRID K520 vs Quadro K4200
When choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Quadro K4200.
GRID K520
Main Specs
GRID K520
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K520 has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 and Quadro K4200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 and Quadro K4200 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 26 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 26 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 400 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−33
QHD / 1440p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 32% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
55−60
100−105
4K / 2160p
30−35
55−60
high / 768p
140−150
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
20−22
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
55−60
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 32% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K4200.
Full Specs
GRID K520
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
23 July 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
1536
1344
Core clock speed
745 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
87.81
Floating-point performance
2x 2,448 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
267 mm
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
76 Mh/s
119 Mh/s
Check Price
