GRID K520 vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing GRID K520 and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M2000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 293 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 and Quadro M2000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 173 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |