GRID K520 vs Quadro M500M
When choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Quadro M500M.
GRID K520
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 996 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 460% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Quadro M500M. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 December 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4004 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |