GRID K520 vs Quadro P2000

When choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro P2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Quadro P2000.

GRID K520

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P2000 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 331 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 66 mm longer, than Quadro P2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 2008 MHz higher, than GRID K520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	20−22	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 135% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
QHD / 1440p	9−10	35−40
4K / 2160p	6−7	18−20
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 124% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	100−110	180−190
QHD / 1440p	55−60	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−35	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	80−85
medium / 1080p	21−24	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	100−110	180−190
medium / 1080p	55−60	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	10−11	30−35
4K / 2160p	10−11	24−27
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	140−150
medium / 768p	80−85	130−140
high / 1080p	30−35	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 82% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	9−10
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 135% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	130−140
medium / 768p	35−40	85−90
high / 1080p	20−22	50−55
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K520.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro P2000
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	GK104	GP106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	6 February 2017
Pipelines	1536	1024
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	94.72
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length	267 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K520 vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares