GRID K520 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro T2000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Quadro T2000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 185 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K520. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 930 / 1200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 103.7 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |