GRID K520 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro T2000 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Quadro T2000 mobile, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 275% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 and Quadro T2000 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 830 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K520. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |