GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 7690M
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7690M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7690M.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1025% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 145 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Thames XT / XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |