GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 8750M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Radeon HD 8750M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 8750M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GRID K520 and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 457% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 75% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 71 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |