GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 450.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 127 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |