GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 5100.
GRID K520
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 32 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K520. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Ellesmere |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 250 Mh/s |