GRID K520 vs Radeon R5 M435
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R5 M435, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Radeon R5 M435, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 35 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 126% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 457% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 206% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 75% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Jet |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |