GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M365X

When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M365X.

GRID K520

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	20−22	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	3−4
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	12−14
medium / 1080p	27−30	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 414% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	110−120
medium / 768p	180−190	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	35−40
QHD / 1440p	55−60	−
4K / 2160p	30−35	10−11
high / 768p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	95−100	40−45
ultra / 1080p	65−70	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	9−10
medium / 1080p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	100−110	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	27−30	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	14−16
medium / 1080p	30−35	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 457% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	90−95	40−45
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	10−11	1−2
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	2−3
medium / 1080p	14−16	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	4−5
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	7−8
medium / 768p	35−40	6−7
high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	23.04
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	737.3 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares