GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M465
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M465, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M465.
GRID K520
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |