GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 270X

In this comparison between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GRID K520 Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 180 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • GRID K520 has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 270X.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270X.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
  • GRID K520 and Radeon R9 270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 16−18 24−27
ultra / 1080p 9−10 14−16
QHD / 1440p 4−5 10−11
4K / 2160p 4−5 6−7
low / 720p 30−35 45−50
medium / 1080p 20−22 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than GRID K520.

Full Specs

  GRID K520 Radeon R9 270X
Architecture Kepler GCN
Code name GK104 Curacao XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 23 July 2013 8 October 2013
Pipelines 1536 1280
Core clock speed 745 MHz
Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 95.36 84.00
Floating-point performance 2x 2,448 gflops 2,688 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA 3.0
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 76 Mh/s 318 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
  Check Price