GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 FURY X

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Radeon R9 FURY X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 FURY X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K520

Radeon R9 FURY X Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	275 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R9 FURY X has 22% more power consumption, than GRID K520.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K520 and Radeon R9 FURY X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
GRID K520 and Radeon R9 FURY X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 76 mm longer, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	50−55
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	75−80
medium / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	80−85
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
QHD / 1440p	9−10	55−60
4K / 2160p	6−7	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	130−140
medium / 1080p	27−30	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Battlefield 5 is 212% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
GRID K520 and Radeon R9 FURY X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	230−240
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
QHD / 1440p	55−60	150−160
4K / 2160p	30−35	100−110
high / 768p	140−150	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	65−70
ultra / 1080p	18−20	60−65
QHD / 1440p	16−18	40−45
4K / 2160p	6−7	21−24
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Far Cry 5 is 190% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
QHD / 1440p	16−18	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	100−110	220−230
medium / 1080p	55−60	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Fortnite is 152% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	21−24	65−70
QHD / 1440p	10−11	50−55
4K / 2160p	10−11	30−35
low / 720p	55−60	130−140
medium / 1080p	30−35	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	160−170
medium / 768p	80−85	150−160
high / 1080p	30−35	95−100
ultra / 1080p	12−14	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	95−100
medium / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Metro Exodus is 235% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	75−80
ultra / 1080p	18−20	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	60−65	120−130
medium / 1080p	24−27	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 160% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	30−35	95−100
medium / 1080p	16−18	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	190−200
medium / 768p	35−40	120−130
high / 1080p	20−22	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K520.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Code name	GK104	Fiji
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	24 June 2015
Pipelines	1536	4096
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	268.8
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	8,602 gflops
Length	267 mm	191 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	858 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
Mantle		+
Design		reference
Bridgeless CrossFire		+
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		33.4 Mh/s
Compute units		64
AppAcceleration		+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
FRTC		+
		Check Price

GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 FURY X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares