GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 M295X
When comparing GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M295X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M295X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M295X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 11% more power consumption, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 22 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K520. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M295X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GK104 | Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | Not Listed |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 392 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |