GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 M365X
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M365X.
GRID K520
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Tropo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |