GRID K520 vs Radeon R9 M370X
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M370X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M370X.
GRID K520
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M370X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Cape Verde |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 19 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 125 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |