GRID K520 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

In this comparison between GRID K520 and Radeon RX Vega 9 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 9 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon RX Vega 9 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 9 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 9 here:

Main Specs

  GRID K520 Radeon RX Vega 9
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price
  • GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - in Laptops.
  • GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - with Vega.
  • GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 16−18 12−14
ultra / 1080p 9−10 8−9
QHD / 1440p 4−5 2−3
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 30−35 27−30
medium / 1080p 20−22 16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9.

Full Specs

  GRID K520 Radeon RX Vega 9
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name GK104 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Workstation Laptop
Release date 23 July 2013 26 October 2017
Pipelines 1536 576
Core clock speed 745 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 95.36
Floating-point performance 2x 2,448 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 76 Mh/s
  Check Price