GRID K520 vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K520

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	220−230
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	100−110	110−120
QHD / 1440p	55−60	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	110−120
medium / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−12
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	80−85	85−90
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
medium / 768p	35−40	40−45
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1536	448
Core clock speed	745 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	32.14
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	90 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares