GRID K520 vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Main Specs
GRID K520
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
GRID K520 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
55−60
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−11
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
80−85
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
GRID K520 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
GRID K520 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GRID K520
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK104
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
23 July 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1536
448
Core clock speed
745 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
32.14
Floating-point performance
2x 2,448 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
267 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
76 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
